
Harjas Popli
About
Policy commitments
We all want healthy, affordable, and comfortable homes. These policies will help to lower energy bills, cut pollution, and improve indoor air quality.
Our community is already experiencing the harmful impacts of climate change caused by fossil fuel pollution, and taxpayers are on the hook to upgrade and repair critical infrastructure.
The air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat all rely on healthy ecosystems. Nature can also help protect our community from extreme weather by controlling floods, protecting shorelines, and cooling neighbourhoods. Access to nature improves the health and well-being of residents, and supports biodiversity.
We envision vibrant, walkable communities that protect nature and improve food security.
Connecting neighbourhoods through public transit and active transportation networks will cut pollution, improve public health, and make our communities more affordable (and fun!).
Climate change, increasing populations, and overconsumption threaten our water security. Healthy watersheds and forests are critical to support clean drinking water, stormwater management, climate resilience, and biodiversity for future generations.
Zero waste policies reduce pollution, keep waste out of landfills, build resilient local economies, and safeguard public health by shifting society away from a disposable culture toward a sustainable circular economy.
Climate action
Worse than that, missed opportunities delay solving the problems and create further downstream. Deteriorating relationships between governments at all levels as well as with those they are entrusted to be responsible. Climate inaction has all manner of costs. Lives are lost the more disconnected from each other we are. Shocking tragedies in Nepal or the evacuations and heat deaths in Europe are from the same science that applies here in BC. Thinking longer-term on climate includes linking our personal and collective actions towards measurable outcomes and positive impacts for ourselves and others.
Questions for Saanich
There are many things in the near and long-term that will incur costs and we all have a say to decide how distributed, fair, and intense those costs will be. That helps inform next steps.
At the Saanich level as nearly everywhere else the current infrastructure cannot withstand an increasing pace of alternating heat domes and atmospheric rivers. They are happening more years than not. Baked soil becomes water repellant, making flooding likelier and worse. It might cost to do something about that, both in land use and money. We should talk about what it costs and how distributed, fair, or intense it is.
Other priorities include ensuring mature tree canopy, as cited in the BC Coroners Service report following the 2021 heat dome that areas with less canopy cooked in the sun and were an increased health risk.
Not acting also costs. The clean-up after the 2021 atmospheric river is about $4 billion, split between mainly Canada and BC.
Continuing the partnerships with regional, provincial and federal counterparts enable discussions about solution-costing and how distributed, fair, or intense they are. We must be transparent and promote these discussions and welcome more voices in building one Saanich.
Without further scenario-building I can only communicate my approach and my commitment on this is simple: listen, stay accessible, and work with others to build Saanich toward a better future. I believe welcoming more transparency, more leaning in is good for a healthy democracy that can meaningfully address the future challenges whether we want them or not.
I heard that people often get engaged in local government when government gets it wrong, but that must change something when people engage in a reaction and frustration rather than come together to build together?
We may increasingly need government to get it right and that seems less likely to happen if we are are not building together. What opportunities the community has to stay meaningfully informed and when to contribute and how meaningful their contribution becomes is important to structure well so expectations are clearer and productive discussions are more likely. There may not be a perfect system, but as one example I have supported participatory budgeting make democracy a practice rather than a reaction to a mistake or exclusion. That is one way neighbourhoods can be connected and contributing, seeing a local impact to a park or public space while staying informed on larger finances.
Leadership here is upholding others.