
Randy Millis
About
Policy commitments
We all want healthy, affordable, and comfortable homes. These policies will help to lower energy bills, cut pollution, and improve indoor air quality.
Our community is already experiencing the harmful impacts of climate change caused by fossil fuel pollution, and taxpayers are on the hook to upgrade and repair critical infrastructure.
The air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat all rely on healthy ecosystems. Nature can also help protect our community from extreme weather by controlling floods, protecting shorelines, and cooling neighbourhoods. Access to nature improves the health and well-being of residents, and supports biodiversity.
We envision vibrant, walkable communities that protect nature and improve food security.
Connecting neighbourhoods through public transit and active transportation networks will cut pollution, improve public health, and make our communities more affordable (and fun!).
Climate change, increasing populations, and overconsumption threaten our water security. Healthy watersheds and forests are critical to support clean drinking water, stormwater management, climate resilience, and biodiversity for future generations.
Zero waste policies reduce pollution, keep waste out of landfills, build resilient local economies, and safeguard public health by shifting society away from a disposable culture toward a sustainable circular economy.
Climate action
I use public transit and, when I have owned vehicles, I have tried to plan trips efficiently, keep vehicles properly maintained, and choose the most fuel-efficient option I could reasonably afford that still met my transportation needs.
I have not been in a financial position to purchase a new highly fuel-efficient, hybrid or electric vehicle. I think that is also an important perspective in climate policy: people have different incomes, housing situations, transportation needs and abilities. Effective climate action needs to be practical and accessible so people can participate without being priced out.
Questions for Kelowna
I support improving building efficiency and resilience to extreme heat, particularly where measures can reduce long-term energy costs and protect vulnerable residents. I would consider practical measures such as better insulation and building envelopes, passive cooling and shade, heat pumps and other efficient cooling systems, while examining available provincial, utility and other funding so municipal policy does not unnecessarily add to housing costs.
My approach would be to set measurable goals, determine what falls within municipal authority, evaluate costs and benefits, and then monitor whether the measures are actually improving efficiency, affordability and heat resilience.
I support improving building efficiency and resilience to extreme heat, particularly where measures can reduce long-term energy costs and protect vulnerable residents. I would consider practical measures such as better insulation and building envelopes, passive cooling and shade, heat pumps and other efficient cooling systems, while examining available provincial, utility and other funding so municipal policy does not unnecessarily add to housing costs.
My approach would be to set measurable goals, determine what falls within municipal authority, evaluate costs and benefits, and then monitor whether the measures are actually improving efficiency, affordability and heat resilience.
Walking and rolling infrastructure should be safe and connected. I would prioritize filling gaps in sidewalks, curb cuts, crossings and cycling/rolling networks rather than building isolated pieces that do not connect people to where they need to go. Accessibility needs to work for people using wheelchairs, mobility devices, strollers and other forms of active transportation.
I would use ridership, reliability, accessibility and actual use of infrastructure to measure results. Reducing transportation emissions works best when lower-emission choices are also affordable, convenient and practical. I would also continue working with BC Transit and regional partners because Council does not control every part of the transit system on its own.
The earlier curbside proposal raised legitimate concerns about cost and the exclusion of multifamily housing. Any renewed program should examine how renters, apartment and condo residents, businesses and single-family households can participate rather than creating a system that excludes a significant part of the community.
Because solid-waste management is regional, I would work with the Regional District and neighbouring municipalities to examine the most cost-effective options, available infrastructure and outside funding. If the evidence shows that an expanded organics program can provide meaningful landfill diversion at a reasonable cost, I would support moving it forward with measurable diversion targets and public reporting.
I also want to explain my Neutral responses elsewhere in this questionnaire. Neutral does not necessarily mean I oppose the objective. Several statements ask candidates to commit to implementing policies without enough information about the specific proposal, cost, funding source, consequences or, in some cases, which level of government has authority.
I don’t think responsible government means making a commitment first and examining the details afterward. As a councillor, I would determine what Kelowna can actually do, examine the evidence, costs, alternatives and impacts on affordability, and then make a decision.
Residents should expect measurable progress and public reporting on the actions Council adopts. If something isn’t producing the intended results, Council should be willing to change course.
Compiled & presented by