Dan Eheler

Dan Eheler

Council · Rossland
Rossland 22 yrs

Policy commitments

Buildings

We all want healthy, affordable, and comfortable homes. These policies will help to lower energy bills, cut pollution, and improve indoor air quality.

~ Support electrification of new buildings. Neutral
✓ Incentivize electric heat pumps and air filtration systems. Supportive
~ Scale up energy retrofits for existing homes, businesses, and public buildings. Neutral
~ Implement a 'right to cool' bylaw to protect tenants during extreme heat events. Neutral
Climate Justice

Our community is already experiencing the harmful impacts of climate change caused by fossil fuel pollution, and taxpayers are on the hook to upgrade and repair critical infrastructure.

~ Pursue available legal options to recover a fair share of the climate costs facing our community from fossil fuel companies and other big polluters. Neutral
~ Collaborate with Indigenous peoples as partners in the stewardship of the land, air, and water, and work towards reconciliation. Neutral
Ecosystems

The air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat all rely on healthy ecosystems. Nature can also help protect our community from extreme weather by controlling floods, protecting shorelines, and cooling neighbourhoods. Access to nature improves the health and well-being of residents, and supports biodiversity.

✓ Protect and restore ecosystems, which are essential to human survival, health, and economic well-being. Supportive
✓ Expand and protect tree canopy, parks, and green infrastructure to cool neighbourhoods, clean air, and manage stormwater. Supportive
Land Use

We envision vibrant, walkable communities that protect nature and improve food security.

✓ Build affordable homes near jobs, schools, shops, and transit. Supportive
✓ Upgrade critical infrastructure for heat, fire, flood, and storm resilience. Supportive
✓ Increase food security by supporting local agriculture and community gardens. Supportive
Transport

Connecting neighbourhoods through public transit and active transportation networks will cut pollution, improve public health, and make our communities more affordable (and fun!).

✓ Deliver reliable, frequent, affordable local transit. Supportive
✓ Advocate to improve regional public transit between communities. Supportive
~ Expand EV charging infrastructure. Neutral
Watersheds

Climate change, increasing populations, and overconsumption threaten our water security. Healthy watersheds and forests are critical to support clean drinking water, stormwater management, climate resilience, and biodiversity for future generations.

✓ Implement water conservation plans and educate the public to conserve drinking water. Supportive
✓ Protect and restore watersheds as vital municipal infrastructure. Supportive
~ Develop and implement a water security plan. Neutral
Zero Waste

Zero waste policies reduce pollution, keep waste out of landfills, build resilient local economies, and safeguard public health by shifting society away from a disposable culture toward a sustainable circular economy.

✓ Support the development of a circular economy to eliminate waste and improve resilience. Supportive
✓ Implement bylaws to eliminate waste from new buildings, renovation, and demolition projects and to use existing buildings as efficiently as possible. Supportive
✓ Supportive
~ Neutral
× Opposed
– No response

Climate action

How have you contributed to climate action in your community through advocacy, past work, advisory committees, volunteer work, and/or reducing your personal carbon footprint?
Climate action, for me, starts with everyday practices rather than big pronouncements. In both my personal life and across the businesses I operate in Rossland, we work daily to reduce waste, and to reuse and recycle materials wherever possible rather than sending them to the landfill. As a contractor, that means being deliberate about materials on job sites — diverting what can be reused, cutting down on unnecessary waste, and being mindful of our footprint on every project.

I've also made it a priority to protect trees wherever I can, whether that's preserving mature trees on a site or thinking twice before removing green space that doesn't need to go. These may seem like small, practical choices, but multiplied across years of business operations, they add up.

I haven't sat on a climate-specific advisory committee, but my years with the Rossland Chamber of Commerce, the Arena Task Force and the Economic Task Force gave me a good understanding of how sustainability and cost decisions intersect at the municipal level — an approach I'd bring to council.
I recognize there's more I can do, both personally and in my businesses, and I see municipal leadership as a chance to extend that mindset community-wide — encouraging the everyday waste reduction and environmental care that doesn't require large budgets, just consistent effort.

Questions for Rossland

Do you support saving Record Ridge, and if so what will you do a) locally to make sure it doesn’t happen and b) in your work with the Province?
Record Ridge sits outside Rossland's municipal boundary, so the City's direct authority is limited — this is fundamentally a provincial decision. That doesn't mean no voice, though, and there's real work council can do.

I think often about the multi-generational farms in the Paterson area, where families are now raising a fourth generation on properties that could be directly affected. Those are real people with real stakes, and their concerns about potential damage to their land and water deserve to be heard and taken seriously by both the City and the Province.

Locally, I'd push Rossland to formally engage with the Province and regional partners to ensure concerns about downstream water impacts, farmland, and lost recreation access are part of the official record, and support independent water-quality monitoring for the watershed.
Provincially, I do not support any project that risks damaging downstream drinking water, farmland, or recreation areas residents rely on, and I'd advocate for a full environmental assessment before construction proceeds.

At the same time, if this project does move forward despite these concerns, I don't think Rossland should be left empty-handed. I'd want the City to explore whether a community benefit agreement could bring real value back here — funding toward pool or arena upgrades, daycare spaces, or other priorities that improve quality of life for residents. Standing firm against the risks doesn't mean giving up on making sure Rossland benefits if this decision is ultimately made outside our control.
What next steps will you prioritize over the next 4 years to move forward on Rossland’s 100% Renewable Kootenay Plan?
Progress on the 100% Renewable Kootenay Plan depends on the whole council working together, and as one voice at the table, I see my role as pushing for practical, achievable next steps — not promising outcomes I can't deliver alone.

One priority I'd advocate for is fixing how we handle construction and yard waste. Right now, Rossland doesn't have a good local solution for tree and stump disposal or construction debris, which means usable material gets wasted or hauled long distances instead of being diverted and reused. I'd push for the City to explore a proper reuse centre — a place where residents and contractors can drop off and pick up reusable materials, lumber, and yard waste instead of sending it to landfill. Even as one councillor, I can raise this consistently and build support for it around the table, since it supports the plan's goals by cutting the waste and emissions tied to construction and demolition.

Beyond that, I'd use my voice to keep the plan grounded in wins we can realistically deliver within budget — continuing energy-efficiency incentives for buildings, supporting EV charging as demand grows, and pursuing outside funding to offset bigger infrastructure costs.
Real progress on renewable energy goals takes the whole council and community moving together. My commitment is to keep raising these practical steps and advocating for movement, even when change comes incrementally.
What steps would you take to reduce environmental risks, support long-term prosperity and strengthen Rossland’s resilience as a mountain community closely connected to its natural environment?
As a mountain community, Rossland is on the front line of a changing climate — longer dry seasons, higher wildfire risk, and less predictable snowpack — and I take that seriously as both a business owner and a parent.

I think the City deserves credit here: Rossland has done a good job reducing water usage in recent years, and to my knowledge we haven't had to rely on our backup reservoir. That's a real achievement, and I want to build on it rather than take it for granted.

One of the most immediate, practical next steps is reducing the water we lose before it ever reaches a tap. Rossland's water system has aging infrastructure, and leaky lines waste a resource we can't afford to lose as summers get hotter and drier. I'd prioritize investing in finding and fixing those leaks, which conserves water and eases strain on the system during peak drought periods.
Alongside infrastructure fixes, I'd focus on maintaining the consumption reductions we've already achieved — through continued public education, fair water pricing, and encouraging water-wise practices among residents and businesses.

Wildfire risk also needs continued attention through FireSmart programs and maintaining defensible space around the community, and I'd support council continuing to work with the Regional District and provincial partners on wildfire mitigation funding.
These aren't flashy solutions, but they're steady, practical investments that build real resilience — protecting the progress we've made while preparing for the climate we're actually facing.
How should the City plan for long-term water security, and what investments, policies or changes in water management would you prioritize to ensure Rossland has a reliable and resilient water supply for both current and future residents?
Long-term water security in Rossland needs to be treated as core infrastructure planning, not an afterthought — especially with a growing population and less predictable snowpack putting more pressure on our supply.

I'd prioritize public education so residents understand the state of our system and simple ways to reduce consumption, from fixture upgrades to seasonal watering practices. Education only works, though, if it's paired with real options — so I'd want the City to look at ways to make water-efficient upgrades more affordable and accessible for residents who can't easily pay for them upfront.

On the investment side, I support continuing to fund the infrastructure work our water system needs — including leak detection and line repairs — so we're not losing treated water before it reaches homes and businesses. I'd also want the City to plan water investment alongside growth planning, so new development is only approved where our water system can actually support it, rather than adding demand first and figuring out capacity later.

Ultimately, the City's job is to make conservation easy and affordable for residents while investing steadily in the infrastructure that protects our supply for the next generation. That combination — practical education, accessible options, and disciplined investment — is how Rossland stays resilient as both our climate and our population change.
How would you balance the financial benefits of development with protecting the natural environment and ensuring Rossland remains a strong, connected community for year-round residents?
I believe in smart, controlled growth — development that strengthens Rossland's tax base and keeps the community viable for year-round residents, without sprawling into places that strain our infrastructure or erode what makes Rossland worth living in.

In practice, that means encouraging growth in areas that already have the infrastructure to support it — existing water, sewer, and road capacity — rather than pushing development into areas that would require significant new spending or contribute to sprawl. Growing where infrastructure already exists is both fiscally responsible and better for the environment, since it reduces the need for new roads and services that fragment green space. Done well, that kind of growth can also help hold property taxes closer to their current rates, since we're growing the tax base without adding the cost of major new infrastructure.

Controlled growth also means asking for something back. I'd push for meaningful green space requirements as part of any new development — not just token landscaping, but real, usable green space residents can enjoy and that helps preserve the community's natural character. Developers benefit from building in a community like Rossland, and it's reasonable to expect new projects to contribute to that balance.

Ultimately, I don't think Rossland has to choose between growth and character. Smart, controlled growth — directed to the right places, paired with real green space requirements, and guided by a council that's deliberate rather than reactive — is how we keep both our tax base and our community intact.
What role do you believe the municipal government should play in supporting the health of residents?
Municipal government can't deliver health care directly, but it has real influence over many factors that determine how healthy a community actually is — housing, food security, transportation, and recreation among them.

Housing is one of the clearest levers the City has, and I think we need to be honest about what "affordable" actually means rather than using it as a buzzword. I'd want the City to define affordability clearly — tied to local incomes, not just a marketing label on a development — and I'd consider supporting a Rossland housing authority to help drive that work forward. Housing costs are one of the biggest stressors families here face, and that stress affects health just as much as physical illness does.

We also can't focus only on young families. Seniors need housing options just as much, and I'd push for a full range of housing — from starter homes to family units to seniors' housing — rather than assuming one type solves the problem.

Food security is another area where local government has a role. I support growing produce in our region — whether through community gardens, supporting local growers, or making it easier for residents to access fresh, local food. A community that can feed more of itself is a healthier, more resilient one.

Beyond that, council's job is to keep investing in the basics that support healthy living: safe roads and reliable transportation, well-maintained recreation facilities and trails, and a natural environment residents can enjoy.
If you wish to clarify or add information you may use this space.

Compiled & presented by

Authorized by West Kootenay Climate Hub, registered sponsor under LECFA, wkclimatehub@gmail.com

Vote4Tomorrow is an independent voter guide to evaluate where local candidates stand on climate and environmental policies that will affect our future.

© 2026 Vote4Tomorrow