
Sam Holland
About
Policy commitments
We all want healthy, affordable, and comfortable homes. These policies will help to lower energy bills, cut pollution, and improve indoor air quality.
Our community is already experiencing the harmful impacts of climate change caused by fossil fuel pollution, and taxpayers are on the hook to upgrade and repair critical infrastructure.
The air we breathe, the water we drink, and the food we eat all rely on healthy ecosystems. Nature can also help protect our community from extreme weather by controlling floods, protecting shorelines, and cooling neighbourhoods. Access to nature improves the health and well-being of residents, and supports biodiversity.
We envision vibrant, walkable communities that protect nature and improve food security.
Connecting neighbourhoods through public transit and active transportation networks will cut pollution, improve public health, and make our communities more affordable (and fun!).
Climate change, increasing populations, and overconsumption threaten our water security. Healthy watersheds and forests are critical to support clean drinking water, stormwater management, climate resilience, and biodiversity for future generations.
Zero waste policies reduce pollution, keep waste out of landfills, build resilient local economies, and safeguard public health by shifting society away from a disposable culture toward a sustainable circular economy.
Climate action
In terms of my personal carbon footprint, I tend to take transit, walk, bike before I drive, although I do use carshare from time to time.
Questions for Oak Bay
Climate emissions in Oak Bay come from two main sources— home heating and transportation. Home heating is the simplest to tackle; I support replicating Saanich's extremely effective heat pump loan program, which allows residents to get low cost loans to install heat pumps and pay them off through property tax. Adding heat pumps is also a climate adaptation measure, as they also protect residents from extreme heat.
Transportation emissions are more complicated to address; they must be tackled from both ends. The District needs to legalize and encourage more small businesses so that residents can walk and roll to more of their daily needs. Oak Bay also needs to facilitate more attainable housing near existing services and transit. This will likely require a review of the Official Community Plan, a new zoning code, and tactics like pre-approved building designs. I also support building out a complete walk and roll network, so that everyone can get around safely and efficiently.
Oak Bay has to balance this densification with the restoration of the Bowker Creek watershed and increasing tree canopy in the District, which I will discuss more in the next question.
I also support rapidly expanding tree cover in areas without many street trees (Henderson, Willows, and the Landsdowne slope in particular have areas with relatively few street trees). As noted, the District can not meet its tree cover goals with existing public land alone. While I support strong tree protection bylaws, trees on private land will always be more vulnerable than trees in protected parkland. To me, this underscores the importance of expanding parkland across Oak Bay, including smaller neighbourhood parks, and in the longer term, possibly taking parts of the Uplands and Victoria Golf Clubs into municipal ownership for restoration. This approach is one of the only ways to permanently protect and expand endangered ecosystems in Oak Bay.
Previous councils have unfortunately concentrated development near the Bowker Creek floodplain, while limiting the types of housing options that can be built anywhere else. I support bringing more housing options to neighbourhoods across Oak Bay, while enhancing our urban ecosystem.
Compiled & presented by
