Lonsdale Energy Company has often promised a carbon neutral pathway. What steps will you take to ensure this report is published in the next year?
Lonsdale Energy Corp might not be able to deal a 'right to cool' as it was heat only, highly centralized, not necessarily resilient (cast iron pipes) system supported by a bylaw that discouraged a/c in many early buildings and has a pricing structure that might actually discourage wholistic smart, thermally balanced buildings. It has to justify its very existence in addition to it path to carbon neutrality.
Expensive renewable natural gas (RNG) use was introduced as a temporary solution for Lonsdale Energy Company to decarbonize, but is now a permanent part of LEC's energy mix. What steps will you take to eliminate RNG from LEC's energy mix?
Oh for crying out loud... it is possible that LEC was a greenwashing exercise from the start. It forced geo thermal on to the new School Board building that may or may not be successul. The solar thermal array on top of the Library seems to have been a failure.
What steps would you take to correct the taxes that residents must now pay due to Metro Vancouver's handling of the sewage treatment plant?
Hah! Good one .."correct" the taxes. Like you think they got the math wrong? They are not taxes, they are rates based on operating flow and the dollars that will be needed to pay P&I on Metro debt to the MFA. The NorthShore's reps to Metro applied for 30 amortization of NSWWTP debt back in 2021!! That's before the 2022 election...if they knew something bad was coming (they must have) they should have been struggling mightily to pull their communities out of harms way instead of being Vice Chair exactly during the time the sh*t was getting real. What can be done now? I dunno. Find a good lawyer and see if there are flaws or some kind of case in administrative law or natural justice that can push back on a process by which the 92% can arbitrarily decide that the 8% should suffer as they must?
What steps would you take to require retention of mature trees through land use planning or other tools.
Well for one thing the natural canopy in North Vancouver, and the enforcement of tree cutting standards should be done North Vancouver - wide. Management of important riparian areas and watersheds should not be impeded by a really stupid and very unnatural City/District boundary.
Should the tree bylaw apply to ALL sites, even if the sites are not being re-developed?
I honestly don't know. There seems to be some backstory or agenda to this question that I am not privy to.